Professional & Knowledgable Law Team

Friday, February 3, 2012

HC directs DGP to ensure presence of cop in court with file


Coming down heavily on a Punjab Police cop for removing a court file, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed the State Director General of Police (DGP) to ensure his presence before the Court with the file.
Assistant sub-inspector Ram Dass had taken an “original agreement” to sell a property, for investigation of the property matter from the trial court record with an undertaking to return it-which he failed to do so.
Taking serious notice of the matter, Justice LN Mittal issued notice of motion to the State and issued directions to the DGP.
“Copy of the order be sent to DGP, Punjab, with a direction to ensure the presence of ASI Ram Dass in this court,” stated Justice Mittal. The matter will now come up for further hearing on March 22.
The matter pertains to argument over the property between Ludhiana residents Gurdeep Singh and Bhupinder Singh. During the hearing of the matter, the Bench was informed that a case was registered at Ludhiana’s police station division number eight regarding forgery of an agreement to sell, dated April 10, 2003.
“For the investigation of the case, ASI Ram Dass took the original agreement from the record of the trial court with the undertaking to return the same after getting the signature or handwriting compared by a handwriting expert,” observed Justice Mittal adding, “But, ASI Ram Dass failed to return the agreement to the trial court.”
“It has been observed in the order dated March 10, 2006, of the trial court that ASI Ram Dass was present. He was warned regarding his conduct in not returning the agreement inspite of an undertaking and was given a last opportunity to produce the original agreement in the Court. In spite thereof, the agreement has not been returned by ASI Ram Dass,” observed the Bench.

Punjab removes 48 tainted cops


Taking action against its convicted cops, Punjab has finally removed four Deputy Superintendents of Police (DSPs) besides 48 other convicted policemen of different ranks.
The four convicted DSPs include Bhupinder Singh, Sukhdev Singh Chhina, Parminder Singh and Avinderbir Singh. While Bhupinder Singh and Parminder Singh were dismissed on January 19, the other two were dismissed on December 19 last.
Just a day before, the Punjab Government has issued a Press statement regarding dismissal of two PPS officers-DSP (Direct) Parminder Singh, and DSP No. 28/FR Bhupinder Singh “after their convictions by Special Judge Hoshiarpur on September 19, 2011, and District and Sessions Judge Faridkot on September 30, 2009, respectively. Both the officers had been dismissed from the service of the Government of Punjab with effect from December 14, 2011.”
The assertions came through an affidavit filed by Assistant Inspector General of Punjab Police (Welfare and Litigation) MS Chhina during the resumed hearing of the public interest litigation filed by city-based advocate HC Arora.
The affidavit, placed before the Division Bench of Justice MM Kumar and Justice RN Raina, stated that 14 convicted cops have been retained in service as they have been acquitted in appeals, while other four convicted cops have either died or retired from service.
The affidavit also contained the list of 22 cops, who had been given lenient punishments instead of being dismissed from service, in pursuance to DGP’s circular of May 18, 2010.
The DGP had directed that cops convicted for offences with prescribed sentence of up to three years imprisonment should not be dismissed from service, while recommending lenient punishment.
The cops include a sub-inspector, two ASIs, nine head constables and 10 constables. The police officials released by the Courts on probation after conviction and retained in service includes ASI Des Raj, constable Vasu Dev, HC Karnail Singh and constable Harbans Singh.
The affidavit was handed over to the petitioner during hearing, the Bench adjourned the matter for further hearing to enable the petitioner to argue the case for removal of the 22 convicted cops, along with those convicted cops retained in service due to release on probation.
Besides, the validity of DGPs circular will also come up for consideration and arguments on the adjourned date-February15.

20 immigration firms sealed in Chandigarh


Chandigarh, February 2
The Special Investigating Team of the UT police has sealed 20 immigration firms in the city in a case of work permit fraud. As per the police case, the companies had been sending aspirants abroad on work permit visa without obtaining licence from the Protector of Emigrants, Chandigarh.
The police said innocent persons had been cheated of lakhs by these companies, which grabbed huge amounts for preparation of various documents.
The police sealed the companies after booking those in a case under Sections 188 and 420 of the IPC and Section 24 of the Immigration Act. Two persons, Mahesh Gupta of Conex in Sector 34 and Nitin Gupta, proprietor of AEIS Consultant at Sector 34, were arrested. The companies had been booked for not abiding
by the orders of the District Magistrate under Section 144 of the CrPC, which had made it compulsory for companies to furnish information to the police. The police said 153 companies furnished information with the police and only 17 were found to be having valid licence.
Dirty twenty
The 20 companies included World Wide Immigration Consultancy Services in Sector 22, Career Overseas in Sector 17, Immigration Private Limited in Sector 17, Ray Numbes Consultant in Sector 22, Sri Balaji in Sector 17, NS Consultant in Sector 44, GEC Consultant in Sector 44, Conex in Sector 34, Pacific Consultant in Sector 34, JA Enterprises in Sector 34, Rapid Growth in Sector 8, Global Visas Consultancy in Sector 8, Visa Ways Immigration Consultant in Sector 8, Pacific Immigration Consultant in Sector 8, Future Wings Consultant in Sector 37, Palta Travels in Sector 40, CSA Immigration in Sector 35, AEIS Consultant in Sector 34, Ezy Gateway Visa Consultant in Sector 8 and Pennacle Career Consultant in Sector 8.

GENERAL FAQ'S ABOUT NRE ACCOUNT


Who qualifies as a Non-Resident Indian (NRI)?

An NRI is a person residing outside India but who is a citizen of India or is a person of Indian origin. Under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), generally, a person is residing outside India if the person is in India for less than 182 days during the course of the preceding financial year and also includes any person who stays abroad:
  • for employment, or
  • for carrying on any business or vocation, or
  • for any other purpose indicating an intention of stay outside India for an uncertain period
  • for education*
* provided the student has stayed overseas for more than 182 days in the preceding financial year.
Who is a person of Indian origin?
You are deemed to be a person of Indian origin if you are a foreign citizen (other than of Pakistan or Bangladesh), and if:
  • you have at any time held an Indian passport or
  • you or either of your parents or any of your grandparents were citizens of India by virtue of the Constitution of India or the Citizenship Act, 1955
  • you are the spouse of an Indian citizen or of a person of Indian origin (other than of Pakistan or Bangladesh
What are the types of Bank accounts available to NRIs?
The type of accounts available to you are:
  • Non-Resident External (NRE)
  • Non-Resident Ordinary (NRO)
  • Foreign Currency Non-Resident (FCNR)
Can I open a joint account?
Type of AccountJoint Account with Resident IndiansJoint Account with non-resident Indians
NROYesYes
NRENoYes
FCNRNoYes
Can I open an NRI account without having to come to the branch in India?
Yes. You can open an account with the designated bank branch in India without having to come to the branch in India.

चंडीगढ़ में 156 इमीग्रेशन कंपनियां नकली


 
चंडीगढ़-विदेश भेजने की आड़ में लाखों करोड़ों रुपए बटोरने का खेल इत्मीनान से चल रहा है।चंडीगढ़ में 156 इमीग्रेशन कंपनियां ऐसी हैं जिनके पास न तो रजिस्ट्रेशन है न लाइसेंस।
गोरखधंधा चलाने वाली ऐसी कंपनियों की तालाबंदी शुरू कर दी गई
है। अब तक 17 कंपनियां सील की जा चुकी हैं। सात कंपनियों के विरुद्ध केस दर्ज किया जा चुका है। दो कंपनी मालिकों महेश गुप्ता [कानेक्स,सेक्टर-34] और नितिन गुप्ता [एईआईएस, 34ए] को गिरफ्तार किया जा चुका है।
एसएसपी नौनिहाल सिंह का कहना है कि विदेश मंत्रालय से मान्यता हासिल करने वाले इमीग्रेशन एजेंटों की संख्या सिर्फ 22 है जबकि अभी तक 186 कंसलटेंसी एजेंसियों के नाम सामने आ चुके हैं।
इमीग्रेशन स्कैम का भंडाफोड़ करने वाली विशेष जांच टीम का नेतृत्व कर रहे सीआईडी डीएसपी अनिल जोशी के अनुसार पंजाब, हरियाणा, उत्तारप्रदेश और दिल्ली तक इमीग्रेशन का जाल बिछा चुकी नामावर कंपनियों के पास न तो वांछित मान्ताएं हैं न ही वे विदेश मंत्रालय के मान्यता प्राप्त एजेंटों की सूची में हैं।
जोशी ने कहा छापेमारी के चलते जब इमीग्रेशन कंपनी के पास सीविल में एक कर्मी को बतौर ग्राहक भेजा गया है तो कंपनी ने खुलेआम लाइसेंस होने की हामी भरी और वर्क परमिट के लिए भी हां कर दी, ऐसा लिख कर भी दे दिया। लेकिन कंपनी के पास वर्क परमिट का लाइसेंस ही नहीं है जबकि वेबसाइटों पर वर्कपरमिट दिलाने का खुलकर वादा किया गया है।
डीएसपी जोशी ने कहा कि डब्ल्यूडब्ल्यूडब्ल्यूआईसीएस के नाम से स्थापित कंपनी की वेबसाइट भी इमीग्रेशन नियम उल्लंघन में दोषी पायी गई है। सिटी के प्रमुख सेक्टर-22सी में स्थिति कंपनी कार्यालय, एससीओ नंबर 2415-16 को सील कर दिया गया है।